Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Jane Wasserson vs Elizabeth Halbauer Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Wasserson vs Halbauer analysis and find out who is favored!
Jane Wasserson vs Elizabeth Halbauer Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Wasserson 0 - 0 Halbauer
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Wasserson has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Halbauer has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Wasserson, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Halbauer has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Wasserson has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Halbauer has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Wasserson has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Halbauer winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Wasserson has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 20% (W/L 13/ 51), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 12% (W/L 3/ 23). Halbauer has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 153/ 98), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 46% (W/L 6/ 7).
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Wasserson has played against opponents with an average rank of while Halbauer has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Wasserson has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Halbauer has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Wasserson has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Halbauer has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Ret.
Rank
844
High
27
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
752
Rank
260
High
26
Age
Plays
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
Form
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
18% (16-74)
Career Total W/L
57% (207-159)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$1,225
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Jane Wasserson vs Elizabeth Halbauer For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Wasserson VS Halbauer
Sportsbook
Offer
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Jane Wasserson | Elizabeth Halbauer |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Jane Wasserson Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | 6-4 5-7 10-6 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-1 1-6 10-7 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-1 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats 
Alexandra Anttila
Player
Jane Wasserson
56%
(
29 of
52)
1st Serve %
51%
(
28 of
55)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
16 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
66
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-1 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
view more
Elizabeth Halbauer Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Julia Grabher
Player
Elizabeth Halbauer
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve %
73%
(
40 of
55)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
5
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elizabeth Halbauer
Player
Barbora Michalkova
68%
(
72 of
106)
1st Serve %
58%
(
58 of
100)
-
Aces
-
13
Double Faults
5
56%
(
40 of
72)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
24 of
58)
29%
(
10 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
18 of
42)
73%
(
11 of
15)
Break Points Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
53%
(
56 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
58 of
100)
108
Total Points Won
98
|
5-7 7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mona Barthel
Player
Elizabeth Halbauer
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve %
56%
(
31 of
55)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
12 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
61
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elizabeth Halbauer
Player
Julia Avdeeva
68%
(
78 of
115)
1st Serve %
52%
(
62 of
119)
0
Aces
6
9
Double Faults
6
65%
(
51 of
78)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
37 of
62)
38%
(
14 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
26 of
57)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
43%
(
50 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
56 of
119)
121
Total Points Won
113
|
5-7 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Julia Middendorf
Player
Elizabeth Halbauer
59%
(
65 of
111)
1st Serve %
63%
(
74 of
118)
2
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
6
57%
(
37 of
65)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
42 of
74)
39%
(
18 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
17 of
44)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
50%
(
56 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
59 of
118)
114
Total Points Won
115
|
7-6(3) 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ekaterina Makarova (1996)
Player
Elizabeth Halbauer
82%
(
61 of
74)
1st Serve %
69%
(
44 of
64)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
4
49%
(
30 of
61)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
18 of
44)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
73%
(
8 of
11)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
51%
(
38 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
41 of
64)
77
Total Points Won
61
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sapfo Sakellaridi
Player
Elizabeth Halbauer
86%
(
44 of
51)
1st Serve %
70%
(
35 of
50)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
1
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
57%
(
4 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
18 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
41
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elizabeth Halbauer
Player
Margaux Rouvroy
80%
(
32 of
40)
1st Serve %
69%
(
35 of
51)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
38%
(
3 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
14 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
31 of
51)
57
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Malene Helgo
Player
Elizabeth Halbauer
59%
(
61 of
104)
1st Serve %
69%
(
80 of
116)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
7
61%
(
37 of
61)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
43 of
80)
53%
(
23 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
42%
(
44 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
55 of
116)
115
Total Points Won
105
|
5-7 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tereza Smitkova
Player
Elizabeth Halbauer
66%
(
75 of
113)
1st Serve %
78%
(
72 of
92)
2
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
4
60%
(
45 of
75)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
42 of
72)
50%
(
19 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
43%
(
49 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
92)
105
Total Points Won
100
|
6-3 2-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Wasserson Vs Halbauer Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Wasserson are available here and Halbauer photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
